<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 78 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789009</link>
    <description>Section 62(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 permits condonation of delay only up to 15 days beyond the prescribed 45-day period, if sufficient cause is shown. On that basis, a delay of 253 days was held to be far beyond the outer statutory limit and the appeal was not entertainable. The Court accordingly treated the matter as barred by limitation and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 78 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789009</link>
      <description>Section 62(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 permits condonation of delay only up to 15 days beyond the prescribed 45-day period, if sufficient cause is shown. On that basis, a delay of 253 days was held to be far beyond the outer statutory limit and the appeal was not entertainable. The Court accordingly treated the matter as barred by limitation and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>