<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 93 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789024</link>
    <description>Processing a return under section 143(1) permits only limited adjustments; it does not authorise a substantive disallowance of expenditure at the intimation stage. An incorrect return by the assessee, by itself, was insufficient to expand the CPC&#039;s scope of adjustment. The impugned intimation was therefore treated as unsustainable in law and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 93 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789024</link>
      <description>Processing a return under section 143(1) permits only limited adjustments; it does not authorise a substantive disallowance of expenditure at the intimation stage. An incorrect return by the assessee, by itself, was insufficient to expand the CPC&#039;s scope of adjustment. The impugned intimation was therefore treated as unsustainable in law and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>