<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 246 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50975</link>
    <description>Imported X-ray spectrometer goods were classified by applying the tariff scheme and HSN notes, with the essential character found in their use of X-rays rather than in their generic identity as a spectrometer. The HSN note for apparatus based on the use of X-rays expressly covers X-ray diffraction and X-ray spectrometry equipment used for examination of materials, so sub-heading 9022.19 was held to be the correct classification. Decisions relating to spectrometer accessories and polishing kits were treated as distinguishable because they did not concern classification of the X-ray spectrometer itself. The lower appellate authority&#039;s classification under sub-heading 9027.30 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 246 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50975</link>
      <description>Imported X-ray spectrometer goods were classified by applying the tariff scheme and HSN notes, with the essential character found in their use of X-rays rather than in their generic identity as a spectrometer. The HSN note for apparatus based on the use of X-rays expressly covers X-ray diffraction and X-ray spectrometry equipment used for examination of materials, so sub-heading 9022.19 was held to be the correct classification. Decisions relating to spectrometer accessories and polishing kits were treated as distinguishable because they did not concern classification of the X-ray spectrometer itself. The lower appellate authority&#039;s classification under sub-heading 9027.30 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>