<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 136 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789067</link>
    <description>Conditional pre-deposit can justify remand for fresh adjudication on merits where the assessee agrees to comply with additional deposit requirements. The court recorded the petitioner&#039;s willingness to deposit a further 15% of the disputed tax over and above the 10% already paid, directed filing of a reply to the show-cause notice with supporting documents, and provided for adjustment of amounts already recovered. Upon compliance, the bank attachment was ordered to be lifted, while the respondent&#039;s right to proceed in default was preserved. The matter was therefore sent back for reconsideration subject to the stipulated pre-deposit and related compliance conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 136 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789067</link>
      <description>Conditional pre-deposit can justify remand for fresh adjudication on merits where the assessee agrees to comply with additional deposit requirements. The court recorded the petitioner&#039;s willingness to deposit a further 15% of the disputed tax over and above the 10% already paid, directed filing of a reply to the show-cause notice with supporting documents, and provided for adjustment of amounts already recovered. Upon compliance, the bank attachment was ordered to be lifted, while the respondent&#039;s right to proceed in default was preserved. The matter was therefore sent back for reconsideration subject to the stipulated pre-deposit and related compliance conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>