<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 142 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789073</link>
    <description>A GST adjudication order is vulnerable where the confirmed demand does not tally with the show cause notice and appears to travel beyond its scope, because Section 75(7) confines adjudication to matters proposed in the notice and requires the assessee to be informed of the case to be met. On that basis, the impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration on merits after corrigendum and response.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 142 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789073</link>
      <description>A GST adjudication order is vulnerable where the confirmed demand does not tally with the show cause notice and appears to travel beyond its scope, because Section 75(7) confines adjudication to matters proposed in the notice and requires the assessee to be informed of the case to be met. On that basis, the impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration on merits after corrigendum and response.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>