<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 217 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50970</link>
    <description>For purposes of the second proviso to Rule 57T(1) of the Central Excise Rules, a declaration for Modvat credit on capital goods may be treated as filed within time by taking the factory registration date as the relevant reference point where the unit was not yet registered and production had not commenced. Receipt of the capital goods before registration did not defeat credit, because the proviso was read to permit delayed filing within the extended period from receipt and the administrative circular was found consistent with that approach. Modvat credit on the capital goods was therefore allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 217 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50970</link>
      <description>For purposes of the second proviso to Rule 57T(1) of the Central Excise Rules, a declaration for Modvat credit on capital goods may be treated as filed within time by taking the factory registration date as the relevant reference point where the unit was not yet registered and production had not commenced. Receipt of the capital goods before registration did not defeat credit, because the proviso was read to permit delayed filing within the extended period from receipt and the administrative circular was found consistent with that approach. Modvat credit on the capital goods was therefore allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>