<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Arm&#039;s length interest on inter-company loans cannot be raised solely for unsecured subsidiary lending where no fresh risk change is shown.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98344</link>
    <description>Where inter-company loans are advanced to subsidiary entities under the assessee&#039;s management and control, a higher arm&#039;s length interest rate is not justified merely because the loans are unsecured or the subsidiaries have a weaker credit profile. The Tribunal applied the principle noted in Bharti Airtel Limited and held that control over the subsidiary reduces, rather than increases, lending risk. It also found that the earlier accepted interest rates for the USA and Netherlands entities had not been disturbed in prior years and no fresh material showed any change in risk profile. The transfer pricing adjustment to the arm&#039;s length price of interest was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Arm&#039;s length interest on inter-company loans cannot be raised solely for unsecured subsidiary lending where no fresh risk change is shown.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98344</link>
      <description>Where inter-company loans are advanced to subsidiary entities under the assessee&#039;s management and control, a higher arm&#039;s length interest rate is not justified merely because the loans are unsecured or the subsidiaries have a weaker credit profile. The Tribunal applied the principle noted in Bharti Airtel Limited and held that control over the subsidiary reduces, rather than increases, lending risk. It also found that the earlier accepted interest rates for the USA and Netherlands entities had not been disturbed in prior years and no fresh material showed any change in risk profile. The transfer pricing adjustment to the arm&#039;s length price of interest was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>