<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Shipping bill amendments for MEIS benefit allowed where a wrong declaration was treated as a curable procedural lapse.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98330</link>
    <description>Shipping bill amendments were allowed under Section 149 to correct the reward column from &quot;No&quot; to &quot;Yes&quot; for MEIS claims, as the wrong entry was treated as a curable procedural lapse and not a bar to substantive export incentive. The Tribunal held that delay in seeking amendment must be assessed on the facts of each case, and the notification-based time limit could be extended where the competent customs authority was satisfied with the explanation. The preliminary forum objection was rejected because the matter had long remained before a Single Member without objection from Revenue. Consequential relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Shipping bill amendments for MEIS benefit allowed where a wrong declaration was treated as a curable procedural lapse.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98330</link>
      <description>Shipping bill amendments were allowed under Section 149 to correct the reward column from &quot;No&quot; to &quot;Yes&quot; for MEIS claims, as the wrong entry was treated as a curable procedural lapse and not a bar to substantive export incentive. The Tribunal held that delay in seeking amendment must be assessed on the facts of each case, and the notification-based time limit could be extended where the competent customs authority was satisfied with the explanation. The preliminary forum objection was rejected because the matter had long remained before a Single Member without objection from Revenue. Consequential relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>