<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs broker penalty and post-resolution tax claims fail where no proved contravention and resolution plan extinguishes dues</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98329</link>
    <description>A customs broker&#039;s penalty under the residuary provision was set aside because its role was limited to filing Bills of Entry on importer-supplied information, with no proof that it advised or was responsible for the incorrect tariff classification. The Tribunal held that the statutory duty to make a truthful declaration lay on the importer, and unproven allegations of CBLR violations could not sustain liability under Section 117. It also held that post-resolution show cause notices could not survive once the importers&#039; resolution plan had been approved, as pre-resolution claims not included in the plan stood extinguished under insolvency law. The consequential demands were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs broker penalty and post-resolution tax claims fail where no proved contravention and resolution plan extinguishes dues</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98329</link>
      <description>A customs broker&#039;s penalty under the residuary provision was set aside because its role was limited to filing Bills of Entry on importer-supplied information, with no proof that it advised or was responsible for the incorrect tariff classification. The Tribunal held that the statutory duty to make a truthful declaration lay on the importer, and unproven allegations of CBLR violations could not sustain liability under Section 117. It also held that post-resolution show cause notices could not survive once the importers&#039; resolution plan had been approved, as pre-resolution claims not included in the plan stood extinguished under insolvency law. The consequential demands were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 08:50:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>