<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 156 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50965</link>
    <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied to a recipient merely because of an alleged irregularity at the dealer&#039;s end, where the dealer&#039;s invoice is regular on its face and no discrepancy in the document itself is shown. The text states that the denial rested only on an objection that the dealer was not entitled to issue the invoice from the registered godown because the manufacturer&#039;s original invoice stood in the dealer&#039;s head office name. In the absence of any adjudication or action against the dealer, and where the assessee&#039;s credit is supported by a proper document, the denial of credit is unsustainable and consequential relief follows.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:04:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 156 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50965</link>
      <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied to a recipient merely because of an alleged irregularity at the dealer&#039;s end, where the dealer&#039;s invoice is regular on its face and no discrepancy in the document itself is shown. The text states that the denial rested only on an objection that the dealer was not entitled to issue the invoice from the registered godown because the manufacturer&#039;s original invoice stood in the dealer&#039;s head office name. In the absence of any adjudication or action against the dealer, and where the assessee&#039;s credit is supported by a proper document, the denial of credit is unsustainable and consequential relief follows.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>