https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467756 Additional evidence at the appellate stage under Order XLI Rule 27(1)(aa) is admissible only where the party shows that, despite due diligence, the evidence was not within its knowledge or could not be produced at trial. The provision does not permit a party to produce material at leisure or by choice. On the stated facts, the request to produce a road map was found unconvincing, particularly when made by a public authority, and no legal infirmity was shown in refusing it. The concurrent findings of the courts below were also not shown to be perverse, so no interference with the decree was warranted. en-us Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Apr 2026 18:23:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467756 Additional evidence at the appellate stage under Order XLI Rule 27(1)(aa) is admissible only where the party shows that, despite due diligence, the evidence was not within its knowledge or could not be produced at trial. The provision does not permit a party to produce material at leisure or by choice. On the stated facts, the request to produce a road map was found unconvincing, particularly when made by a public authority, and no legal infirmity was shown in refusing it. The concurrent findings of the courts below were also not shown to be perverse, so no interference with the decree was warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467756