https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467749 Bail under the NDPS Act was refused despite the recovered quantity being below commercial quantity because the Court treated the alleged offence as grave in view of the contraband and the accused's asserted role. The risk of absconding, along with the fact that trial evidence had not yet been recorded, weighed against release. The objection to the FSL report was rejected because it reflected the presence of diacetylmorphine. The precedent cited by the defence was held distinguishable on its facts, and the bail application was dismissed. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Apr 2026 12:06:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467749 Bail under the NDPS Act was refused despite the recovered quantity being below commercial quantity because the Court treated the alleged offence as grave in view of the contraband and the accused's asserted role. The risk of absconding, along with the fact that trial evidence had not yet been recorded, weighed against release. The objection to the FSL report was rejected because it reflected the presence of diacetylmorphine. The precedent cited by the defence was held distinguishable on its facts, and the bail application was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467749