https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467746 A subordinate customs authority must implement an appellate order setting aside absolute confiscation and permitting redemption for re-export when no stay has been granted in revision. Mere pendency of proceedings under Section 129DD of the Customs Act does not suspend the appellate order or justify continued detention of the goods. Applying judicial discipline, the Court held that the respondent could not ignore the appellate relief and directed release of the detained gold for re-export, subject to compliance with the redemption fine and penalty conditions imposed in appeal. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Apr 2026 10:48:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467746 A subordinate customs authority must implement an appellate order setting aside absolute confiscation and permitting redemption for re-export when no stay has been granted in revision. Mere pendency of proceedings under Section 129DD of the Customs Act does not suspend the appellate order or justify continued detention of the goods. Applying judicial discipline, the Court held that the respondent could not ignore the appellate relief and directed release of the detained gold for re-export, subject to compliance with the redemption fine and penalty conditions imposed in appeal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467746