<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 169 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50955</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for cash discount deductions in excise duty valuation, setting aside the disallowance by the assessing authority and the Commissioner (Appeals). By referencing established legal principles and previous judgments, including those of the Supreme Court and the Bombay High Court, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in applying legal principles in such cases. The appellant&#039;s argument, supported by relevant provisions and case laws, influenced the Tribunal&#039;s decision, highlighting the significance of adherence to legal precedents in excise duty valuation matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:33:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 169 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50955</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for cash discount deductions in excise duty valuation, setting aside the disallowance by the assessing authority and the Commissioner (Appeals). By referencing established legal principles and previous judgments, including those of the Supreme Court and the Bombay High Court, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in applying legal principles in such cases. The appellant&#039;s argument, supported by relevant provisions and case laws, influenced the Tribunal&#039;s decision, highlighting the significance of adherence to legal precedents in excise duty valuation matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>