<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NO SYMBOLIC POSSESSION IN CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16116</link>
    <description>Symbolic possession under SARFAESI is a paper possession of secured property without physical control, but the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires the Interim Resolution Professional to take actual control and custody of the corporate debtor&#039;s assets on commencement of CIRP. The article examines whether, in a section 10 CIRP, a corporate debtor may hand over only symbolic possession to the Interim Resolution Professional. Referring to the Orion Water Treatment Private Limited case, it notes that the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal found no legal basis for symbolic possession in CIRP and upheld actual handover of assets, records, and cooperation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 07:51:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 07:51:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NO SYMBOLIC POSSESSION IN CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16116</link>
      <description>Symbolic possession under SARFAESI is a paper possession of secured property without physical control, but the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code requires the Interim Resolution Professional to take actual control and custody of the corporate debtor&#039;s assets on commencement of CIRP. The article examines whether, in a section 10 CIRP, a corporate debtor may hand over only symbolic possession to the Interim Resolution Professional. Referring to the Orion Water Treatment Private Limited case, it notes that the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal found no legal basis for symbolic possession in CIRP and upheld actual handover of assets, records, and cooperation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 07:51:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>