<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788932</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the review petition and civil revision petitions was not condoned because the explanation showed unexplained inactivity, lack of promptness, and no due diligence; the State&#039;s status did not by itself justify the delay. Review jurisdiction was confined to an apparent error, new matter, or analogous sufficient reason, so a re-argument on already considered grounds was not entertainable. On the tax issue, denatured spirit was treated as a distinct commodity from ethyl alcohol under the statutory scheme and notifications, so it could not be brought within the entry-tax notification by interpretation. The levy on that basis was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 10:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788932</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the review petition and civil revision petitions was not condoned because the explanation showed unexplained inactivity, lack of promptness, and no due diligence; the State&#039;s status did not by itself justify the delay. Review jurisdiction was confined to an apparent error, new matter, or analogous sufficient reason, so a re-argument on already considered grounds was not entertainable. On the tax issue, denatured spirit was treated as a distinct commodity from ethyl alcohol under the statutory scheme and notifications, so it could not be brought within the entry-tax notification by interpretation. The levy on that basis was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>