https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788942 Service of a section 8 demand notice under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as sufficient when sent to the corporate debtor's registered email address reflected in MCA records, and by registered post. The dismissal of the section 9 application on a disputed issue of non-service was unsustainable because the operational creditor was not given a fair opportunity to prove service, especially where the respondent remained ex parte. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision after permitting the creditor to establish compliance with section 8. en-us Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Apr 2026 07:51:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788942 Service of a section 8 demand notice under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as sufficient when sent to the corporate debtor's registered email address reflected in MCA records, and by registered post. The dismissal of the section 9 application on a disputed issue of non-service was unsustainable because the operational creditor was not given a fair opportunity to prove service, especially where the respondent remained ex parte. The rejection order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision after permitting the creditor to establish compliance with section 8. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788942