<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 19 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788950</link>
    <description>Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 permits amendment of shipping bills after export where the request is otherwise legally maintainable, and a three-month limit in a Board circular cannot override that statutory power. A clerical or procedural mistake in the shipping bill should not by itself deprive an exporter of duty drawback when the export is otherwise eligible. On that basis, conversion of the shipping bills was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 07:51:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 19 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788950</link>
      <description>Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 permits amendment of shipping bills after export where the request is otherwise legally maintainable, and a three-month limit in a Board circular cannot override that statutory power. A clerical or procedural mistake in the shipping bill should not by itself deprive an exporter of duty drawback when the export is otherwise eligible. On that basis, conversion of the shipping bills was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>