<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 56 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788987</link>
    <description>For reassessment beyond three years in a search case, the recorded reasons must themselves show that the escaped income is represented in the nature of an asset for the relevant year; a later year&#039;s material cannot cure that jurisdictional defect, so the AY 2013-14 notice and the linked special audit direction were quashed. By contrast, where the recorded reasons for AY 2015-16 identified a receivable arising from a reimbursement right, the notice was treated as within limitation because receivables can constitute an asset, and the special audit direction was sustained because the statutory preconditions under Section 142(2A) were objectively met on account of account complexity, discrepancies, missing entries, and doubts about correctness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:16:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 56 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788987</link>
      <description>For reassessment beyond three years in a search case, the recorded reasons must themselves show that the escaped income is represented in the nature of an asset for the relevant year; a later year&#039;s material cannot cure that jurisdictional defect, so the AY 2013-14 notice and the linked special audit direction were quashed. By contrast, where the recorded reasons for AY 2015-16 identified a receivable arising from a reimbursement right, the notice was treated as within limitation because receivables can constitute an asset, and the special audit direction was sustained because the statutory preconditions under Section 142(2A) were objectively met on account of account complexity, discrepancies, missing entries, and doubts about correctness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>