https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788989 GST assessment demand was sustained because it matched the taxpayer's own written reply admitting liability for delayed remittance of tax and undertaking payment. In the absence of any substantive ground to dispute that admission, no judicial interference was warranted with the assessment order confirming the demand. The challenge was therefore rejected and the confirmed demand remained in force. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Apr 2026 07:51:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788989 GST assessment demand was sustained because it matched the taxpayer's own written reply admitting liability for delayed remittance of tax and undertaking payment. In the absence of any substantive ground to dispute that admission, no judicial interference was warranted with the assessment order confirming the demand. The challenge was therefore rejected and the confirmed demand remained in force. Case-Laws GST Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788989