<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 210 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50946</link>
    <description>Goods cleared without payment of duty under the export provisions were not exempted goods and were not goods chargeable at nil rate of duty for Rule 57CC purposes. The scheme of the Central Excise rules treated export clearances separately from exempted clearances under Section 5A notifications, and the credit mechanism also recognised export use as a distinct category. Rule 57CC therefore did not apply to such clearances made under Rule 13 and Notification No. 47/94.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:01:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 210 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50946</link>
      <description>Goods cleared without payment of duty under the export provisions were not exempted goods and were not goods chargeable at nil rate of duty for Rule 57CC purposes. The scheme of the Central Excise rules treated export clearances separately from exempted clearances under Section 5A notifications, and the credit mechanism also recognised export use as a distinct category. Rule 57CC therefore did not apply to such clearances made under Rule 13 and Notification No. 47/94.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>