<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1688 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467727</link>
    <description>An ex parte adjudication passed after three opportunities, despite filing of a defence reply, was held unsustainable because the adjudicating authority did not consider the reply or grant an effective hearing. That defect was treated as a breach of natural justice going to the root of the adjudication. The order was set aside and the matter remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after giving the appellant a proper hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 19:02:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1688 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467727</link>
      <description>An ex parte adjudication passed after three opportunities, despite filing of a defence reply, was held unsustainable because the adjudicating authority did not consider the reply or grant an effective hearing. That defect was treated as a breach of natural justice going to the root of the adjudication. The order was set aside and the matter remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after giving the appellant a proper hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>