<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1724 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467735</link>
    <description>Reassessment jurisdiction requires tangible material on correct facts showing a live nexus with escapement of income; reopening based on survey material concerning third parties, alleged accommodation entries, and assumptions unsupported by the record is invalid. The recorded reasons showed no independent application of mind by the AO and relied on incorrect factual assumptions about the alleged loans, so the reopening was bad in law for both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:59:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=894221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1724 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467735</link>
      <description>Reassessment jurisdiction requires tangible material on correct facts showing a live nexus with escapement of income; reopening based on survey material concerning third parties, alleged accommodation entries, and assumptions unsupported by the record is invalid. The recorded reasons showed no independent application of mind by the AO and relied on incorrect factual assumptions about the alleged loans, so the reopening was bad in law for both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>