<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 151 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50920</link>
    <description>Fitting sockets on duty-paid semi-finished PVC pipes, carrying out quality control tests, and affixing a trade or brand name did not amount to manufacture because the processes did not bring into existence a new product with a different name, character or function. The pipes remained pipes, the tests only showed conformity with ISI standards, and branding alone did not create a new item. On that basis, the demand and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:41:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 151 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50920</link>
      <description>Fitting sockets on duty-paid semi-finished PVC pipes, carrying out quality control tests, and affixing a trade or brand name did not amount to manufacture because the processes did not bring into existence a new product with a different name, character or function. The pipes remained pipes, the tests only showed conformity with ISI standards, and branding alone did not create a new item. On that basis, the demand and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>