<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 220 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50918</link>
    <description>An appeal filed through an agent or power of attorney holder is maintainable only if the memorandum and verification are signed in accordance with the governing rule and the filer has specific authority to act for the appellant. Where the record does not show express authorisation empowering the person who signed and verified the appeals, the procedural requirement is not satisfied. On that basis, the appeals were held not maintainable and were dismissed for non-compliance with Rule 213(2)(a) of the Central Excise Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 220 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50918</link>
      <description>An appeal filed through an agent or power of attorney holder is maintainable only if the memorandum and verification are signed in accordance with the governing rule and the filer has specific authority to act for the appellant. Where the record does not show express authorisation empowering the person who signed and verified the appeals, the procedural requirement is not satisfied. On that basis, the appeals were held not maintainable and were dismissed for non-compliance with Rule 213(2)(a) of the Central Excise Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>