<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1405 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467722</link>
    <description>Deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97-CE was available where the final products were made from inputs that were in fact duty paid at the appropriate rate. A collateral dispute about the supplier&#039;s annual capacity of production, or the absence or inaccuracy of the supplier&#039;s certificate under Rule 96ZP, did not by itself defeat the credit when duty payment on the inputs was not in dispute. The denial of deemed credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1405 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467722</link>
      <description>Deemed Modvat credit under Notification No. 58/97-CE was available where the final products were made from inputs that were in fact duty paid at the appropriate rate. A collateral dispute about the supplier&#039;s annual capacity of production, or the absence or inaccuracy of the supplier&#039;s certificate under Rule 96ZP, did not by itself defeat the credit when duty payment on the inputs was not in dispute. The denial of deemed credit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee remained entitled to the benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>