<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 130 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50916</link>
    <description>The court found that the penalties and confiscation of Silk Yarn, as well as the imposition of personal penalties on the truck&#039;s owner, were unjustified. The lack of concrete evidence and independent corroboration led to the conclusion that penalizing the individuals involved was unwarranted. The owner was given the option to redeem the truck by paying a reduced fine, and all appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 130 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50916</link>
      <description>The court found that the penalties and confiscation of Silk Yarn, as well as the imposition of personal penalties on the truck&#039;s owner, were unjustified. The lack of concrete evidence and independent corroboration led to the conclusion that penalizing the individuals involved was unwarranted. The owner was given the option to redeem the truck by paying a reduced fine, and all appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>