https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788887 Denial of CENVAT credit was linked to absence of original documents, while the dispute also covered service tax demand on claimed exports, sponsorship expenses, reconciliation between ST-3 returns and financial statements, cum-tax benefit, invocation of the extended limitation period for suppression of facts, and penalty for suppression or mis-declaration. The Supreme Court dismissed the assessee's SLP against the CESTAT decision, which had allowed the appeal only partly. en-us Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:27:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788887 Denial of CENVAT credit was linked to absence of original documents, while the dispute also covered service tax demand on claimed exports, sponsorship expenses, reconciliation between ST-3 returns and financial statements, cum-tax benefit, invocation of the extended limitation period for suppression of facts, and penalty for suppression or mis-declaration. The Supreme Court dismissed the assessee's SLP against the CESTAT decision, which had allowed the appeal only partly. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788887