<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1669 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788914</link>
    <description>A nil withholding tax certificate under Section 197 had to be assessed on the basis of the assessee&#039;s existing and estimated tax liability under Rule 28AA. The Court held that, where the same income had already been found taxable in India in earlier years and those findings remained undisturbed, the Assessing Officer could not issue a nil deduction certificate contrary to that subsisting position. It also rejected the argument that services rendered through email, conference calls or video conferencing changed the tax consequence for this purpose. The rejection of the nil withholding tax certificate was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1669 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788914</link>
      <description>A nil withholding tax certificate under Section 197 had to be assessed on the basis of the assessee&#039;s existing and estimated tax liability under Rule 28AA. The Court held that, where the same income had already been found taxable in India in earlier years and those findings remained undisturbed, the Assessing Officer could not issue a nil deduction certificate contrary to that subsisting position. It also rejected the argument that services rendered through email, conference calls or video conferencing changed the tax consequence for this purpose. The rejection of the nil withholding tax certificate was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>