<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1679 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788924</link>
    <description>In a GST investigation involving alleged organised online gaming and tax evasion, the Telangana HC held that arrest is not invalid merely because officers were earlier present at the premises; the relevant point is the actual arrest time. On the facts, the Court accepted that the petitioner was arrested at 5:50 am after a search, repeated summons and recorded statements, and that production before the Magistrate at 8:30 pm the same day satisfied Article 22(2). It further found sufficient investigative material linking the petitioner to the alleged offences, so the arrest and remand were not illegal and no violation of Article 22(2) was made out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:27:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1679 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788924</link>
      <description>In a GST investigation involving alleged organised online gaming and tax evasion, the Telangana HC held that arrest is not invalid merely because officers were earlier present at the premises; the relevant point is the actual arrest time. On the facts, the Court accepted that the petitioner was arrested at 5:50 am after a search, repeated summons and recorded statements, and that production before the Magistrate at 8:30 pm the same day satisfied Article 22(2). It further found sufficient investigative material linking the petitioner to the alleged offences, so the arrest and remand were not illegal and no violation of Article 22(2) was made out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>