<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1684 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788929</link>
    <description>A bail condition requiring furnishing of a bank guarantee was held excessively onerous where the accused had already provided a substantial personal bond and sureties. The Supreme Court of India assessed the condition against the governing principles on bail conditions and the existing security arrangement, and found that the additional guarantee was not legally sustainable. The bank guarantee requirement was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1684 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788929</link>
      <description>A bail condition requiring furnishing of a bank guarantee was held excessively onerous where the accused had already provided a substantial personal bond and sureties. The Supreme Court of India assessed the condition against the governing principles on bail conditions and the existing security arrangement, and found that the additional guarantee was not legally sustainable. The bank guarantee requirement was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>