<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 206 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50907</link>
    <description>For remission of duty on molasses in storage, storage loss must be assessed against the total quantity actually stored and cleared during the relevant period, not against a budget-day stock figure derived by a non-scientific dip method. Applying that basis, the loss worked out to about 1.7%, which fell within the Board&#039;s condonable limit of 2%. On that footing, remission could not be refused, and the consequential duty demand, penalty and interest were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:53:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 206 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50907</link>
      <description>For remission of duty on molasses in storage, storage loss must be assessed against the total quantity actually stored and cleared during the relevant period, not against a budget-day stock figure derived by a non-scientific dip method. Applying that basis, the loss worked out to about 1.7%, which fell within the Board&#039;s condonable limit of 2%. On that footing, remission could not be refused, and the consequential duty demand, penalty and interest were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>