<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1686 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788931</link>
    <description>An assessee was denied release of detained goods under section 129(1)(a) because no e-way bill or genuine prescribed documents were produced, and the detention orders were upheld. The text also notes issues concerning suspension of registration, prohibition on taxable supply, the validity of a tax invoice during suspension, and the obligation of the supplier, recipient or owner to generate the e-way bill. The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP against the High Court decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1686 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788931</link>
      <description>An assessee was denied release of detained goods under section 129(1)(a) because no e-way bill or genuine prescribed documents were produced, and the detention orders were upheld. The text also notes issues concerning suspension of registration, prohibition on taxable supply, the validity of a tax invoice during suspension, and the obligation of the supplier, recipient or owner to generate the e-way bill. The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP against the High Court decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>