<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 204 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50900</link>
    <description>Steel structurals fabricated from market-purchased material, using labour and electricity in the factory, were treated as manufactured and marketable goods falling under the tariff entry for structures and parts of structures, making them liable to central excise duty. However, a demand issued in 1993 for goods fabricated during January to June 1988 was held to be beyond the permissible limitation period, so the duty demand and penalty were deleted despite the goods being regarded as excisable. The discussion states that exigibility depends on manufacture and marketability, while delayed demands remain unenforceable if time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:39:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 204 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50900</link>
      <description>Steel structurals fabricated from market-purchased material, using labour and electricity in the factory, were treated as manufactured and marketable goods falling under the tariff entry for structures and parts of structures, making them liable to central excise duty. However, a demand issued in 1993 for goods fabricated during January to June 1988 was held to be beyond the permissible limitation period, so the duty demand and penalty were deleted despite the goods being regarded as excisable. The discussion states that exigibility depends on manufacture and marketability, while delayed demands remain unenforceable if time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>