<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 181 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50895</link>
    <description>Shipping bills filed under the DEEC scheme could be converted into drawback shipping bills where the governing circular permitted such conversion and the alleged defects were procedural or curable. The Tribunal treated objections such as non-mention of denier, absence of representative samples, omission of drawback sub-serial details, and missing certificates as matters that could be verified later by the proper officer when processing the drawback claim. It held that refusal based on these objections rested on speculative assumptions rather than any established legal bar, and the rejection of conversion was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:23:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 181 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50895</link>
      <description>Shipping bills filed under the DEEC scheme could be converted into drawback shipping bills where the governing circular permitted such conversion and the alleged defects were procedural or curable. The Tribunal treated objections such as non-mention of denier, absence of representative samples, omission of drawback sub-serial details, and missing certificates as matters that could be verified later by the proper officer when processing the drawback claim. It held that refusal based on these objections rested on speculative assumptions rather than any established legal bar, and the rejection of conversion was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>