<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 202 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50892</link>
    <description>Printed Gay Wrapper supplied on duty-paid paper, printed to customer specification and delivered in sheets without sizing, is classifiable under sub-heading 4901.90 rather than 4823.90. The product was not cut to size for individual cigarette packets, and the earlier Tribunal view on similar wrappers was followed. On those facts, the contrary classification under 4823.90 was held inapplicable and the demand based on that classification failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:14:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 202 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50892</link>
      <description>Printed Gay Wrapper supplied on duty-paid paper, printed to customer specification and delivered in sheets without sizing, is classifiable under sub-heading 4901.90 rather than 4823.90. The product was not cut to size for individual cigarette packets, and the earlier Tribunal view on similar wrappers was followed. On those facts, the contrary classification under 4823.90 was held inapplicable and the demand based on that classification failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>