<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 137 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50891</link>
    <description>Revocation of a Customs House Agent licence was held unjustified where the inquiry findings were mixed and did not establish connivance with certainty. The Tribunal emphasised that revocation is a grave and disproportionate sanction because it affects the right to carry on trade or profession, and it should be reserved for sufficiently serious proved infractions. As earlier penalty proceedings had already resulted in punishment, the extreme measure of revocation was not warranted on the facts found. The impugned revocation order was therefore set aside and only the punishment already suffered was allowed to stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:59:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 137 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50891</link>
      <description>Revocation of a Customs House Agent licence was held unjustified where the inquiry findings were mixed and did not establish connivance with certainty. The Tribunal emphasised that revocation is a grave and disproportionate sanction because it affects the right to carry on trade or profession, and it should be reserved for sufficiently serious proved infractions. As earlier penalty proceedings had already resulted in punishment, the extreme measure of revocation was not warranted on the facts found. The impugned revocation order was therefore set aside and only the punishment already suffered was allowed to stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>