<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 110 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50888</link>
    <description>Imported copper scrap was not entitled to nil additional customs duty because the exemption applied only to copper waste and scrap used within the factory of production for manufacture of specified products. Scrap brought from abroad and not generated in the importer&#039;s factory did not satisfy that condition, so the exemption could not be extended and the claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 110 - CEGAT, COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50888</link>
      <description>Imported copper scrap was not entitled to nil additional customs duty because the exemption applied only to copper waste and scrap used within the factory of production for manufacture of specified products. Scrap brought from abroad and not generated in the importer&#039;s factory did not satisfy that condition, so the exemption could not be extended and the claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>