<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50885</link>
    <description>Rule 57D permits Modvat credit where inputs are contained in waste, refuse or by-product arising during manufacture, or where inputs become waste during the course of manufacture of the final product; it does not cover inputs found defective and rejected before use. The record showed that the adjudicating authority had treated all disputed watch parts as defective before use without examining whether specific items became waste during assembly or handling in manufacture. The disallowance and penalty were set aside, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after the appellants were allowed to explain the records and produce evidence on shortages and destruction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:46:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50885</link>
      <description>Rule 57D permits Modvat credit where inputs are contained in waste, refuse or by-product arising during manufacture, or where inputs become waste during the course of manufacture of the final product; it does not cover inputs found defective and rejected before use. The record showed that the adjudicating authority had treated all disputed watch parts as defective before use without examining whether specific items became waste during assembly or handling in manufacture. The disallowance and penalty were set aside, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication after the appellants were allowed to explain the records and produce evidence on shortages and destruction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>