<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1621 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788866</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in GST proceedings was declined because the alleged liability was assessed below the statutory threshold that makes the offence non-cognizable and bailable. The Court treated the matter as falling within the GST law&#039;s monetary limit for such offences and held that an apprehension of arrest, by itself, did not justify anticipatory bail on the facts placed before it. The application was therefore rejected on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:48:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1621 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788866</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in GST proceedings was declined because the alleged liability was assessed below the statutory threshold that makes the offence non-cognizable and bailable. The Court treated the matter as falling within the GST law&#039;s monetary limit for such offences and held that an apprehension of arrest, by itself, did not justify anticipatory bail on the facts placed before it. The application was therefore rejected on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>