<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TDS on co-owned property transfers requires no aggregation where each co-owner&#039;s share stays below the threshold.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98220</link>
    <description>Section 194-IA did not require aggregation of consideration attributable to multiple co-owners for the year in question, and the Finance Act, 2024 amendment was prospective and inapplicable. Because the amount relatable to each co-owner was below the statutory threshold, the purchaser had no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 194-IA. As no TDS default survived, the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1), and the consequential interest under section 201(1A) was also unsustainable. The Tribunal followed coordinate bench rulings on the same issue and deleted the demand and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:48:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:48:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TDS on co-owned property transfers requires no aggregation where each co-owner&#039;s share stays below the threshold.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98220</link>
      <description>Section 194-IA did not require aggregation of consideration attributable to multiple co-owners for the year in question, and the Finance Act, 2024 amendment was prospective and inapplicable. Because the amount relatable to each co-owner was below the statutory threshold, the purchaser had no obligation to deduct tax at source under section 194-IA. As no TDS default survived, the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under section 201(1), and the consequential interest under section 201(1A) was also unsustainable. The Tribunal followed coordinate bench rulings on the same issue and deleted the demand and interest.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:48:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>