<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1712 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467676</link>
    <description>Penalty for failure to furnish a return under section 272A(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act was deleted because the assessment order itself had determined the assessee&#039;s income at nil. On that factual basis, the omission to file the return was treated as supported by reasonable cause, so the penalty was not leviable. The appeal was therefore allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 18:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1712 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467676</link>
      <description>Penalty for failure to furnish a return under section 272A(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act was deleted because the assessment order itself had determined the assessee&#039;s income at nil. On that factual basis, the omission to file the return was treated as supported by reasonable cause, so the penalty was not leviable. The appeal was therefore allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>