https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467680 A bail condition requiring furnishing of a bank guarantee/FDR was challenged on the basis of changed circumstances after the surety withdrew the FDR. The Court held that the same condition had already been assailed and upheld by a detailed earlier order, so the petitioner could not reopen the issue through a fresh petition. Financial inability and withdrawal of the surety were not treated as sufficient grounds to revisit a condition already decided on merits. The challenge to the bail condition was therefore rejected, and no interference was made with the previously upheld requirement. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Mar 2026 18:44:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467680 A bail condition requiring furnishing of a bank guarantee/FDR was challenged on the basis of changed circumstances after the surety withdrew the FDR. The Court held that the same condition had already been assailed and upheld by a detailed earlier order, so the petitioner could not reopen the issue through a fresh petition. Financial inability and withdrawal of the surety were not treated as sufficient grounds to revisit a condition already decided on merits. The challenge to the bail condition was therefore rejected, and no interference was made with the previously upheld requirement. Case-Laws GST Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467680