https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467658 Judicial review in disciplinary matters is confined to the decision-making process and does not allow the court or tribunal to reappreciate evidence or act as an appellate forum. Interference is justified only where the enquiry is vitiated by breach of natural justice, statutory illegality, absence of evidence, or a perverse conclusion that no reasonable person could reach. Minor discrepancies in departmental evidence do not make an otherwise supported finding into one based on no evidence. A criminal acquittal, especially on benefit of doubt, does not nullify completed departmental proceedings because the standards of proof differ. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Mar 2026 13:16:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467658 Judicial review in disciplinary matters is confined to the decision-making process and does not allow the court or tribunal to reappreciate evidence or act as an appellate forum. Interference is justified only where the enquiry is vitiated by breach of natural justice, statutory illegality, absence of evidence, or a perverse conclusion that no reasonable person could reach. Minor discrepancies in departmental evidence do not make an otherwise supported finding into one based on no evidence. A criminal acquittal, especially on benefit of doubt, does not nullify completed departmental proceedings because the standards of proof differ. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467658