<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1527 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788772</link>
    <description>Construction services provided to a Defence Ministry department for non-commercial governmental buildings were treated as covered by the retrospective service tax exemption and refund framework, so the tax paid during the interregnum was refundable in principle. The objection of unjust enrichment was not accepted as a complete bar where the tax burden was borne within the governmental reimbursement chain. The refund claim was therefore to be re-examined with the service recipient impleaded as co-applicant, and the earlier rejection was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:57:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1527 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788772</link>
      <description>Construction services provided to a Defence Ministry department for non-commercial governmental buildings were treated as covered by the retrospective service tax exemption and refund framework, so the tax paid during the interregnum was refundable in principle. The objection of unjust enrichment was not accepted as a complete bar where the tax burden was borne within the governmental reimbursement chain. The refund claim was therefore to be re-examined with the service recipient impleaded as co-applicant, and the earlier rejection was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>