<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 197 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50870</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to enhance the value of the imported goods. The appellant successfully challenged the discrepancies in models, origin, quantity, time of import, and suitability for the Indian market. The Tribunal accepted that differences in technology, origin, quantity, timing, and market suitability justified the appellant&#039;s position, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:00:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 197 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50870</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision to enhance the value of the imported goods. The appellant successfully challenged the discrepancies in models, origin, quantity, time of import, and suitability for the Indian market. The Tribunal accepted that differences in technology, origin, quantity, timing, and market suitability justified the appellant&#039;s position, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>