<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1544 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788789</link>
    <description>Post-export amendment of shipping bills was held permissible under Section 149 of the Customs Act where the exporter sought correction of an inadvertent scheme-code entry from Drawback to Drawback and RoSCTL. The later 2022 post-export conversion regulations were treated as inapplicable because the exports and LEOs predated them. The statutory power under Section 149 could not be curtailed by earlier circulars where documentary evidence already supported RoSCTL entitlement, no adverse material existed against the shipping bills, and the correction would not prejudice customs assessment. Rejection of the amendment was therefore unsustainable, and the exporter was entitled to claim the appropriate export incentive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:57:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1544 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788789</link>
      <description>Post-export amendment of shipping bills was held permissible under Section 149 of the Customs Act where the exporter sought correction of an inadvertent scheme-code entry from Drawback to Drawback and RoSCTL. The later 2022 post-export conversion regulations were treated as inapplicable because the exports and LEOs predated them. The statutory power under Section 149 could not be curtailed by earlier circulars where documentary evidence already supported RoSCTL entitlement, no adverse material existed against the shipping bills, and the correction would not prejudice customs assessment. Rejection of the amendment was therefore unsustainable, and the exporter was entitled to claim the appropriate export incentive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>