<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1554 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788799</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment or inaccurate particulars was sustained where the transfer pricing position lacked good faith and due diligence, GDR issue expenses were claimed contrary to settled law, miscellaneous or MODVAT expenses lacked supporting evidence, statutory contribution defaults had no reasonable explanation, and foreign exchange gain and TDS reconciliation income were omitted without a bona fide explanation. Penalty was deleted for foreign exchange derivative loss because it arose from bona fide hedging transactions and the related quantum addition was deleted. The penalty relating to disallowance for non-compliance with tax deduction requirements was restored for fresh consideration because the underlying quantum issue required de novo determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 10:49:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1554 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788799</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment or inaccurate particulars was sustained where the transfer pricing position lacked good faith and due diligence, GDR issue expenses were claimed contrary to settled law, miscellaneous or MODVAT expenses lacked supporting evidence, statutory contribution defaults had no reasonable explanation, and foreign exchange gain and TDS reconciliation income were omitted without a bona fide explanation. Penalty was deleted for foreign exchange derivative loss because it arose from bona fide hedging transactions and the related quantum addition was deleted. The penalty relating to disallowance for non-compliance with tax deduction requirements was restored for fresh consideration because the underlying quantum issue required de novo determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>