https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50868 In anti-dumping proceedings, where the exporter withholds cost-of-production data, the designated authority may treat the exporter as non-cooperating and determine normal value from other reliable information; the dumping finding was upheld on that basis. Material injury was established because dumped imports rose sharply, import prices declined, domestic realizations fell, costs increased, and stocks accumulated, showing significant price erosion in the domestic market. Causation was also proved because the dumped imports became the market benchmark and forced domestic producers to lower prices, so the anti-dumping duty was sustained and the appeals were rejected. en-us Tue, 23 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:54:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50868 In anti-dumping proceedings, where the exporter withholds cost-of-production data, the designated authority may treat the exporter as non-cooperating and determine normal value from other reliable information; the dumping finding was upheld on that basis. Material injury was established because dumped imports rose sharply, import prices declined, domestic realizations fell, costs increased, and stocks accumulated, showing significant price erosion in the domestic market. Causation was also proved because the dumped imports became the market benchmark and forced domestic producers to lower prices, so the anti-dumping duty was sustained and the appeals were rejected. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50868