<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1574 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788819</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act were invalid where the reopening was founded on material already examined in the original scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3). The Court held that reassessment cannot operate as a review and cannot rest on a mere change of opinion about the same facts previously considered. The reopening proceedings and notice were quashed, and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:57:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=893452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1574 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788819</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act were invalid where the reopening was founded on material already examined in the original scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3). The Court held that reassessment cannot operate as a review and cannot rest on a mere change of opinion about the same facts previously considered. The reopening proceedings and notice were quashed, and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>